Filed under: From the Soap Box | Tags: alliances, Bigotry, Capitalism, civilization, clean energy, Climate, corona, corporations, Covid-19, democracy, Democrats, Education, elections, Facebook, Global, healthcare, history, magazines, medicine, Newspaper, racism, science, Sexism, social media, Socialism, students, taxes, teachers, Television, treaties, Trump, Vaccines
I grew up through the 1970’s with a small group of girls in a town on the Western coast of the USA. We went to elementary school, middle school, and high school together. A couple of us moved away, but we always kept in touch and saw each other regularly over the decades. I flew back, in fact, to spend my 50th with them just before Covid-19 hit. We have a chat group in which we talk about the banalities within our lives as well as big issues – marriage, expectations, addiction, disappointment, fears, and motherhood. I always suspected one of these friends supported Trump, but I adopted something akin to “Don’t ask, don’t tell.” Then, a few days ago, in response to video I sent of peaceful protests in our home state and things, perhaps, not being as violent as theyâre purported to be, she told us about her vehement support of Trump and her plans to vote for him again in November, etc.. Moreover, while she has struggled to suppress her staunch support of him in order to be friends with me, she will cut off the friendship if I have a problem with her political affiliation. I was shocked and hurt. I can understand why she may have voted for him in 2016, but after everything that has happened during the last few years stateside, for her to vote for him again left me utterly stunned.
Below, is an email I sent to another member of our ‘gang,’ and my dearest friend in the world – the sister I have never had. That said, she and I have never really discussed politics because I felt she wasn’t particularly interested. Also, I know that her parents are Trumpsters, as are other members of her family, so I didn’t want to put her in an uncomfortable position and potentially have conflict with her (too). But, since the âbreach,â if you will, from the other friend, I wrote an email to her, below, because I can’t carry the confusion and unhappiness I feel about our mutual friend alone, and I feel the need to find out where she stands â to âlay it all bareâ and to ‘throw the dice’ (and a number of other platitudes), hoping that our friendship will bear the burden of potentially diametrical political perceptions.
I share it here because it illustrates how politics has become personal, and questions whether we can reach over (under, above) political divides to those who hold fundamentally different views from our own in our personal lives…
âIn politics, the middle way is none at all.” John Adams
Hello my dear,
I want to address what you said on the group with * and *, about beliefs and finding common ground and what-not. I absolutely agree that divisiveness and power struggles arenât productive, and there is reason to trying to find shared values in order to collectively progressâŚand, actually, thinking about * and her vehement support of Trump, I find myself really evaluating how information we each look at, and the people we tend to âbondâ with and to hold close, generally do share our values and beliefs, and so it is like weâre all operating in a vacuum, including me, by gravitating and engaging with like-minded folksâŚand then, it only takes cynical would-be and actual political leaders to accentuate the natural separation between milieusâŚaided and abetted by targeted ads and ânewsâ stories on social media to encourage and perpetuate oneâs biases.
And, I realize I was âindoctrinatedâ by my father to certain political ideologies :).
However. As you may know :), I question things a lot. I truly try to be honest with myself, even with the âdarkâ corners of my person. I remedy false ideas and admit when Iâm wrong or donât know enough about a subject to proffer an opinion. I also teach sociolinguistics and comparative linguistics (oh yes, the teens dig it :))
And, with my identity having undergone a seismic shift in 2018, Iâve deeply evaluated who I am and why I am and what I value most of all, etc. Add to that the very disturbing global politics and trends âforcingâ me to consider where I stand on political and social issues and why. Perhaps current events have done this for a lot of us?
The following points are not in an effort to persuade you to a certain view, but are offered, instead, as proof that I have thought carefully about my view of Trump and this current administration. That my dislike of him is not a âleftistâ âknee-jerkâ response to him or his party, but carefully considered reasoning.
While I do tend to favor newspapers and magazines that share my general sensibilities, I actually read a lot of information from âboth sides of the aisleâ regularly. So, while I get a regular influx of âHarpersâ Magazine and âForeign Affairsâ and âThe Guardianâ newspaper and âLe Mondeâ and âMother Jonesâ (left leaning intellectual bias) I also regularly read Reddit, “Huffington Post,” David Brooks, “The Sun,” and Fox News (centrist & right leaning bias). Moreover, Iâm quite well versed in global history and politics. Luckily, to understand literature and to teach a given book well, one must understand the context in which itâs written and so Iâm forever researching and cross referencing various time periods and societal perspectives/values/expectations/political occurrences and undercurrents. And, while I concede that most things are arguable, as you note, and that even statistics, themselves, can be read and understood from different angles, there are some things that are my âline in the sandâ and that it would be very tough going to change my mind about. And which, consequently, leaves me in some distress as to whether I can, in fact, be friends with *, or she with me, without a degree of self-consciousness or falsehood…
So, for example, Iâm a devout Social Democrat. Iâm not an American type of Democrat at all, whom I see as centrist and still adhering to big business and the almighty sway of capitalism (in this, I can understand why Trumpsters are disenchanted with the system stateside. That said, I know that USA Democrats created Medicaid, Medicare, Social Security, and free school lunches, for example, so they are different). I believe that taxes should be paid equitably by all in order to secure the infrastructure of society. That it is our civic responsibility for our children, as well as for our neighborâs children, and ourselves. This is not to say that I donât believe in capitalism – I do. BUT, I think unfettered capitalism is destructive, corruptible, and will ultimately lead to hyper inequity and corporate fascism (meaning that corporations and business interests âownâ the governments of the world and motivate their interests and dictate their respective policies). Again, sort of like a Trumpster, I suppose, I think that itâs arguable as to whether itâs even possible to operate outside of that system anymore in the USA. I mean, for example, it takes SO much money to RUN for office – which means youâre giving favors in return for said money no matter how you look at it – that I think itâs a colossal feat to be able to operate outside these moneyed interests thereâŚ
Itâs so strange to me, though, that Trumpsters see Trump as âoutsideâ the system, when he is born of it. Literally. He inherited 240 million dollars from his dad, attended private schools, did poorly in university but wasnât flunked due to donations from his father. Heâs the type of student I (hypocritically) might teach in a private school in Switzerland.
Anyway.
I believe in universal healthcare. I donât see it as those paying taxes taking care of those who don’t or who are lazy, etc., and the odd sense of exceptionalism and individualism and personal convenience in disdain for universal healthcare. I see it as a mark of a collectively oriented society. A civilized society. The Trump administration is hell bent on rolling back even the âkind-of, sort-of universal healthcareâ the Obama admin. enacted.
I believe in a strong public education system, with heavy investment in teachers, schools, administrators and students. This goes for elementary through university. I believe that a solid, democratic, functioning society comes from investment in public education and the possibility that anyone who has merit and interest can go to school and not pay for it for their rest of their lives. Itâs the long view, not short-term planning. I find it saddening and appalling that in the USA, for example, more is spent on maintaining a single prisoner in a penitentiary than on a single student. The current Secretary of Education stateside has never worked in education, donated 30 million dollars to the Trump campaign in 2016, and is an advocate of charter schools and private faith-based schools. Despite what American founding fathers said about the separation of church and state in order to have true religious freedom and to avoid a conflict of interests.
I do not believe that anyone should be prejudiced against because of the color of his or her skin. And in the USA, blacks have been actively and systematically repressed since their arrival as slaves over two hundred years ago. The Trump administration has commended white supremacists, invited them to the White House for visits, and has condemned the Black Lives Matter movement, as well as created the narrative that Antifa is a âterroristâ organization even as the KKK is not.
I believe women are equal to men. Different, but equal. I also believe women have a right to make choices about their bodies, and this means birth control and abortion. Trump has openly insulted women, bullied female congressional leaders, incited his followers to violence against female political leaders who disagree with him, has had numerous harassment cases against him, paid off a call girl during his admin., and speaks in a sexualized manner about his own daughter. What HE has said is what Iâm going by, not what others have said about him. His administration has made it difficult for women to have reproductive care covered by their insurance, even as sexual âaidsâ (sic) are now available to men under general insurance policies.
I believe that global treaties are necessary to avoid world war. Again. This administration has condemned NATO, the EU commission, and pulled out of the Paris Agreement. It has actively antagonized China and Africa, at the same time that it has openly invited foreign intervention in the USA federal elections. Again, Iâm going on what HE says and what a tribunal in the USA found, as well as what various INTEL agencies in the USA and the UK have said. I understand the USA has given a TON of money to these organizations, bolstering them up, and led them, but itâs spending a nickel to save a dime if history is anything to go by, and it is.
I believe that climate change is real and that there is a new future possible in clean energy and sustainable practices. Itâs economically viable to boot. The Trump admin has, again, pandered to fossil fuel interests and the agricultural industry in order to ensure campaign donations and practical support. Meanwhile, bolstering rhetoric to working class souls who rely on these jobs in fossil fuels. BUT, they could be retrained with a modicum of investment and then have jobs that are more secure. But we go back to economic interests.
I believe vaccinations are a godsend, so to speak, but itâs not faith based at all. Science has eradicated polio, measles, and mumps — made it possible not to die of pneumonia or an infection, for example. Not to vaccinate your child is willful ignorance and negligence for the rest of society as well as your child. Any âresearchâ on the possibility of autism with any vaccine has been repeatedly debunked through extensive quantitative research. Similarly, not to wear a mask or maintain a distance during a virus pandemic will hurt those around you. Yet, the Trump administration has repeatedly berated and ridiculed âexpertsâ and âscientists,â long before Covid-19 came to visit. Why? Because a lot of education is not the profile of his base.
I donât think Trump believes even half of what he says. I think he says whatever he needs to say to please the 36% of Americans who believe in him. To them he says Mexicans are rapists and drug addicts (let us not get into the historical creation and political interests of drug cartels in South America). To them, he calls the press âthe left wing media,â when he knows that without the media he wouldnât have gotten the office AND the majority of the news outlets/radio/TV stateside are corporate owned, so they like Trump in office âcause heâs giving their owners tax cuts and profit-making incentives, and he, simply, SELLS newspapers/magazines, etc. He makes them money any way you look at it.
Always follow the money for answers, no? Itâs the same everywhere. While I can understand/itâs logical that many people support Trump âcause he has cut taxes exponentially for the wealthiest and he operates in the interests of business, I do not understand why poor, working class Americans support this man.
So, while I agree with you that we need to find shared ideas and values to make peace and progress, Iâm not sure how we do this now when there are such spectacular divides… Iâve lived abroad a long time (and some USA admins were harder than others to live through here with my Yankee accent) but in 20-odd years, I have never seen the fear, pity, and contempt that Europeans appear to feel about America and Americans now. It breaks my heart. Itâs like watching a fatal car crash in slow motion. To them, itâs the inevitable fall of yet another empire that begs the question of who will fill that vacuum?
And, Iâm actually very confused about maintaining a relationship with *. I love her, I respect her. I know her to be practical, wise, kind, and funny – qualities I admire and hold to be âtrue’. I trust her in a way that I donât most. Perhaps in a way that you can only trust someone because youâve grown up together?
But. Too much is at risk today and politics is personal for me. Particularly with such an explosively divisive man in office in the USA (and, again, I donât for ONE second think that HE is the problem – only the lightning rod – for what has been happening to a great extent since the inception of the USA, and in an acute sense for the last fifty years). What he represents and what he does and says is abhorrent to me and I truly fear for the world if Americans donât vote him out in November.
Yet * has said she will vote for him. Again. That heâs the “best candidate.” (Keep in mind, I get that Biden is no great shakes – yet another old, white, rich dude – but he wonât do what Trump has done in terms of all mentioned above and the attitude – and actions – of being âabove the lawâ). She has been my friend since I was seven-years-old. We havenât kept in close touch consistently over the years, but I always saw her when Iâd go back and I hold her very dear. And our group chats through this terrible time, through the confinement especially, has been the MOST comforting thing for me truly (thank you). Itâs very confusing and I’m very sad. I also know that Iâm a âflightâ rather than âfightâ person and find it easiest to not confrontâŚto âsimplyâ withdraw and have yet another piece of pain and confusion and disappointment to try to unravel.
Again, I absolutely agree that divisiveness and power struggles arenât productive, and there is reason and logic in trying to find shared values in order to collectively progressâŚand I am – even more in the last 48 hours –evaluating the information I look at, and the type of people I tend to âbondâ with and hold close, and who generally share my values and âbeliefs,â and so it IS like Iâm operating in a vacuumâŚand this violates the truest definition of what it is to be âliberal,â which I consider myself to be…
Know that Iâm considering it all. And Iâm sorry for such a loooooonnnnnngggg missive (damn Home Ec class taught me to type quickly). And, I apologize if I have unwittingly offended you in any way with this note. Please forgive me if so. I did not write this to you to incite, to convince, to cajole, to persuade or any other number of verbs for manipulation. I simply wrote it to share my confusion and the intensity of my own opinions with YOU. I feel as though it may seem âpreachyâ to you, but I want to illustrate to you that I HAVE thought about each-and-every element of why I find Trump loathsome â and, again, that itâs not a knee-jerk thoughtless âTrump sucksâ kind-of thing from the âleftâ side of the playing field without consideration for WHY he might be appealing to many.
Thank you for âlistening.â
Filed under: In Vino Veritas, In Aqua Sanitas | Tags: border, critical thinking, debate, Democrats, depression, DNC, Education, Hilary Clinton, Ignorance, information, MAGA, media, Obama, Politics, public institutions, Republicans, social media, suspicion, Trump, USA
I am a firm believer in the people. If given the truth, they can be depended upon to meet any national crisis. The great point is to bring them the real facts. Abraham Lincoln
An (English) friend from Geneva dropped by my house yesterday with her new (English) beau and heâs a raging Brexiter and Trumpster. Iâve actually never had one in my home.
I remained calm (throughout) when he brought up politics and declared âTrump is getting things doneâ and repeated slogans as point-of-fact. I asked what Trump has specifically done? He replied that Trump has âdrained the swamp,â and is âdoing something about illegals,â and, justifying his support, declared âTrump hasnât done anything worse than Obama or Hilary Clinton did…that Hilary Clinton was on her way to jail when she was running for officeâ (âLock her up!â). I tried to ask questions based on fact to prompt specific responses about each of these subjects from him. For example, when he said, âDrain the swamp!â I asked him how he defines the âswamp,â âcause the Treasury Secretary, Steven Mnuchin, was involved with 28k home foreclosures in 2008, in which his company Goldman Sachs and he made a handsome profit; âcause the Education Secretary (Betsy Devos) is a billionaire with no experience educating but who is a large GOP donor; âcause Andrew Wheeler, the Head of the Environmental Protection Agency, is an ex-coal lobbyist. To which he replied, âYou get your information from your sources, and I get mine from my sources.â I said, âThis doesnât have to do with media or social media sources…these are matters of public record.â To which he repeated, âYou have your sources, and I have mine.â
I then asked him what else Trump is doing? He said heâs âdoing something about illegals!â I asked, âYou mean those camps in which a private company, the Corley facility, owned by the GEO Group, which is the nation’s largest private prison company, who are profiting from running detention centers under government contracts that cost the US taxpayer $44 million dollars a year, and who donate large amounts to the GOP party and Trumpâs re election campaign? He said, âItâs nothing Obama and Hilary didnât do.â (Iâm not sure what HILARY Clinton has to do with any of this, really, and the argument that âthey do it too!â is so infantile, but I digress). I said, âBut there are international laws in places that protect those seeking refuge while due process of law is followed.â He said, again, âYou have your information sources, I have mine.â I asked, âIs your source Fox News?â He said defensively, âWhat if it is?â I said, âWell, itâs a right-wing propaganda machine that was set up by Rupert Murdoch to meet his own agenda, which is to make colossal profits and maintain the status quo of white, male empowerment.â To which he sneered that I âprobablyâ watch CNN and read âThe Guardianâ newspaper. I replied, âI donât watch CNN, but I do read âThe Guardian,â among other global newspapers, and âThe Guardianâ is sponsored by its audience rather than corporate advertisers and private investors.
At one point he said that the CIA and the FBI are run by âthe Leftâ who are out to âget Trump,â and that climate change is a âtheory.â To this I replied quietly, âIt was a theory, but now itâs scientific fact.â
But I left it at that, and when they said, a short while, later, âOh, we really should get going…â which is normally the cue for the host to say, âOh! Have one more drink or something more to eat!â I stood up immediately and said, âYes.â And quickly spirited them both to the door, shook their hands, and closed it behind them. Iâm aghast that I had a person so uncritical and uninformed in my home. And Iâm perplexed as to why my friend is dating this person. (She’s an educator!). But this morning I couldnât sleep in the wee morning hours thinking about this manâs âargumentsâ and how this blurring of what is fact and belief has become so commonplace. That people are increasingly becoming so unreflective and undiscerning in their general thinking. That weâre seeing a lack of debating tools in arguments. I would claim that in political âdebate,â weâre seeing a complete breakdown of sane discussion. My heart is heavy today. In my early morning mind, before the sun rose, I thought of all the things I would have liked to have said to this man in the form of questions and facts based on public record, but which I didn’t do out of respect for my friend. Also, perhaps, because I’m not sure that a person like this is motivated to listen to anything that confronts his constructs of reality. I sensed that this one wouldnât listen to counter information because his manner and his words denoted a belligerence that borders on aggressive hostility to certain groups (women, the wealthy, intellectuals, the French, despite living in France). However, so that I can expunge it from my head, I must write up all the things I would have LIKED to have mentioned to this man yesterday evening.
I would start with some basics: What is the definition of âfactâ? (A thing that is known or proved to be true). What is âtrueâ? (Something that can be proved and seen repeatedly over time in the same way each time). What is the definition of âbeliefâ? (An acceptance that something exists or is true, especially one without proof). Do you believe in the Law of Gravity? (When you throw a ball in the air, it will come down. Gravity keeps things on earth from spinning off into space). Is the earth round or flat? (Itâs round and spins on an axis that rotates around the sun). How do you know these things? (Through exhaustive quantitative study). What is a âpublic recordâ? (Public records in the USA come from agencies such as The Department for Motor Vehicles, the Department of Labor and Statistics, the Census Bureau, the Internal Revenue Service, etc.). I am not referring to any media or social media sources when I address the boyfriendâs points, below.
âDrain the Swamp!â Itâs a slogan. What is a âslogan?â A slogan is a short, striking, memorable phrase used in advertising. What is the purpose of advertising? To sell you something. If its purpose is to sell you something, should you be wary of its âtruthâ? Accordingly, using public record only, let us examine Trumpâs declaration that he has âdrained the swamp!â starting with Trump. What is the experience he has that prepares him for the office of USA president? Unlike Obama, he has no formal or professional training in law, activism, history, geography, and politics. He has changed his political affiliation three times (Democrat, Independent, Republican). Personally, he inherited $413 million dollars from his father. He built Trump Taj Mahal hotel and casino for $1.2 billion dollars, declared bankruptcy on it (and consequently did not pay the workers who built the 2010-room hotel and casino), and then sold it for $50 million dollars. Trumpâs daughter, Ivanka, who is a nebulous advisor in the White House, is a clothing manufacturer (with no manufacturing done in the USA) and her husband, a de-facto advisor, is formerly a real estate developer who is millions of dollars in debt to Deutsche Bank. When he was inaugurated into the White House, Trump settled a court case brought against Trump University for fraud to the tune of $25 million dollars. Trumpâs election campaign manager, Paul Manafort, the man responsible for Trumpâs âwin,â has recently been jailed for fraud. Trumpâs personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, often described by Trump, himself, as his âfixer,â has also been jailed for fraud. Trumpâs Treasury Secretary, Steve Mnuchin, has a net worth of $300 million dollars from investment banking. He left a job at Goldman Sachs to run the treasury department of the USA. Betsy Devos, the current Education Secretary, who has no experience educating and whose family has a net worth of $5.8 billion dollars (from Amway), has the experience of being a large donor to the Republican Party. Andrew Wheeler, the Head of the Environmental Protection Agency, is a former coal industry lobbyist (which is a person who takes part in an organized attempt to influence legislators. And âLegislatorsâ are people who make the laws of the land).
I could go on-and-on about a conflict of interest and lack of ethics in this current administration, all based on public record rather than any news source, but I donât have the inclination to do so here. I DID, however, mention a little of this to the boyfriend, and he said, âEveryone does it. Hilary Clinton was doing âpay-to-playâ for years and on her way to jail when she was running for office.â I asked him, âThen why isnât she in jail now?â to which he replied that she has paid off the FBI and CIA to keep her out of prison and has âpowerful backers.â (If she’s so powerful, why isn’t she in the White House? She did win the popular vote). Again, not sure why what she does matters, and this argument is akin to an childâs, but I did say to the boyfriend, âIt doesnât matter who else does it. The office of President or Prime Minister is the highest in the land and that person should be held to higher standards than the rest.â
The boyfriend then stated that once that âtraitorâ Muellerâs report is in âashes,â then Trump will be âclearedâ of the allegations mounted by “the Left.â I didnât mention that Mueller is a Republican and a decorated war hero, unlike Trump who was a draft dodger (as was his father â all matter of public record). I asked the boyfriend why Trump hasnât made his tax returns public in order to show that there is not a conflict of interests entering office, such as banking or Russian oligarchâs campaign donations as âthe Leftâ asserts? The boyfriend said âLots of presidents havenât declared their taxes!â and âThereâs no law!â I said, âName one president who didnât declare their taxes and/or personal income and expenditures.â Again, his response was that he has his âsourcesâ and I have mine. Actually, thereâs an obscure 1924 law about revealing oneâs finances in the bid for US presidency, and the only president in US history NOT to declare their personal income and expenditures was Nixon. Once again, I refer one to public record.
Let us move on to another statement, âHeâs doing something about illegals!â What, exactly, IS he doing? âNothing Obama and Clinton didnât do!â Yes, Obama deported a large amount of illegal immigrants. However, Obama respected the UN treaty on Human Rights Law, which is an agreement that member States are bound to respect. By becoming parties to international treaties, States assume obligations and duties under international law to respect, to protect, and to fulfill human rights (their safety, security, right to dignity). Under the Trump administration’s “zero-tolerance” policy, the Department of Justice began to criminally prosecute all suspected illegal border-crossers for illegal entry, even those who crossed for the first time. Families now undergo separations when parents or adult relatives are charged with unlawful entry. Obama did not do this and he did not oversee detention centers in which basic medical and sanitary services were not being met. Seven children have died in US custody in 2019, compared with NONE in the ten years prior. Again, a matter of public record. More than 11,000 children are now being held by the US govt. on any given day, up from an average of 1,000 in the previous ten years. This administration has also cancelled recreational activities for the âinmates,â which violates US law for any prisoner or detainee. (I did mention a little of this to the boyfriend who said, again, that I have my sources, and he his, but added that Hilary Clinton was involved with âhuman trafficking.â I assume he was referring to the claim that she had been running a child trafficking business from the basement of a pizza parlor? I chose not to entertain this allegation by him).
Additionally, Trumpâs own father and mother were immigrants who sought refuge â like these people currently at the border with Mexico â upon arrival to the USA, but were not housed in detention facilities. Melania, Trumpâs current wife, worked illegally when she first arrived in the USA, and later, lied about her formal education on her application for a Green Card. I would also refer this boyfriend and any other ill-informed person, to research history books and historical public records about the origin of the slogan âAmerica Firstâ in the 1930âs, as well as the birth of the âSouthern Strategyâ in the 1950âs in order to more fully understand the context for this current administrationâs directives.
Finally, this boyfriend stated that Fox News is âno worse a propaganda machineâ than âThe Guardian.â While I will concede that âThe Guardianâ does have a leftist bias, it is funded entirely by its audience, the people. Meanwhile, Fox News is founded by Rupert Murdoch and fed by advertising dollars of corporations and the likes of major GOP donors, such as Bob and Rebecca Mercer and the Koch Brothers. The boyfriend had no idea who these people are. (I did not inform the boyfriend that it was, in fact, President Clinton who made it possible for the birth of the right-wing media in the USA by eliminating the law that stated all public media outlets must state BOTH sides of an argument â a tragic lack of foresight). Meanwhile, itâs illogical that there is a âliberal mediaâ pumping out propaganda to the âthe Left.â Lamentably, corporations and excessively rich men who rely on advertisers and tax cuts own most media outlets in the USA. Which is why one must look at a variety of information sources in a discerning fashion â local newspapers where a story originates, a variety of global news outlets, radio, podcasts, public record, and one must also have some knowledge of history in order to form oneâs political opinion. Simply ‘puppeting’ slogans such as âDrain the Swamp!â and âLock her up!â and âMexicans are rapists and drug dealers!â without anything specifics and facts to base oneâs case on, is why weâre seeing the (cyclical) catastrophic rise of right-wing nationalism and distrust in public institutions (which begs the question – who might want the general public to distrust the public institutions designed to protect its citizens?).
I didnât explain the Electoral College to the boyfriend when he said that Hilary supporters are just âbitterâ about her loss. And, I wonât even broach the subject of this boyfriendâs claim that âclimate change is a theory,” “a hoax,â because itâs so inane and I want another cup of coffee this morning. Coffee – something Iâll miss immeasurably when, and if, idiots like this man, and the fossil fuel and agricultural industries donât finally realize that itâs their sorry selves on the line, too, with global warming. By the way, these aforementioned industrials do know climate change is real, but they pay millions of dollars each year to lobbyists in order to keep governments âin lineâ with business-as-usual, which supports their personal profit-seeking, and people like the boyfriend believing climate change is a âhoax,â in order to keep operating. And no, unlike what the boyfriend stated cynically at one point that âallâ corporations and ârich peopleâ evade taxes and avoid laws, and, furthermore, that âtaxes arenât important,â none of these statements are true. All rich people donât avoid taxes. These actions are not normal, usual, and it is not consequently acceptable to evade taxes. Taxes ARE important for the functioning of a society, or we wouldnât have public health, housing, education, roads, welfare, police and fire services, for example. But, once again, I refer one to the public record of a standard dictionary of language, and the definition of âcollectiveâ versus âindividualistic,” and ask the question, who might benefit from limiting taxes paid to governments? From there, I refer one to a local library to read a bit about economic philosophy and the theory of âtrickle down economics.” From there, incidents in history when this economic model has been used and how well that has worked out for a given land and its people.
However, as this piece focuses on American politics, I must say that I do NOT think that the Democratic Party is much better than the Republican Party, at least historically. In this, I can agree with the motivation behind many of those who chose to vote for Trump in order to disrupt the status quo of governance. The Democrats set the stage for the current USA order by becoming too Centrist. By not paying attention to their constituent’s values and desires that they fight for policies that are farther left than center. Arguably, however, this is due to the campaign ‘machine’ that requires large ‘war chests’ of money, and money generally comes from large corporations and more of the same type who are supporting and protecting the Trump administration. Therefore, Democratic politicians make deals and compromise values in order to do SOMETHING democratic…certainly, the Democrats have been an opposing force to all that Trump might have done, but, once again, they’re in-fighting for power in the run up to the nomination, and the DNC will likely support the most Centrist as the Democratic nominee, thereby showing that no lessons have been learned. But, this is not the subject of this essay. I say it in closing to acknowledge a rotten system to be sure, the specifics to support my argument will have to come in another diatribe I write in my head one pre-dawn morning.
(Gods I hope that getting this out of me this morning works as a catharsis and that my first thought tomorrow morning is NOT the end of the world as I see it â which is the decline of critical thinking).
Filed under: From the Soap Box | Tags: American politics, Democratic National Committee, Democrats, Donald Trump, Political courage, Republicans, United States
To the Democratic National Committee
I come from a family of staunch Democratic Party supporters who have canvassed, campaigned, and fundraised on its behalf for decades. My faith in the Party is, however, shaken. In its place is the suspicion that, ultimately, the Democratic Party is the same as the Republican Party.
In the wake of an electoral upset on November 8th that resulted in an ideological civil war, exacerbated by the consequent behavior of Donald Trump, the Democrats have been silent. There has not been critical attention and investigation to any number of offenses to the office of US president that Trump may have committed, such as his conflict of interests; or his refusal to release tax returns; or his potential collusion with a foreign power in order to defraud the elections; or numerous testimonies of sexual harassment (as well as a court filing for rape of a minor); or the fact that donors to his campaign are now nominees for cabinet posts; or that his staff (like much of yours) is wealthy and white; or that there have been overt Neo Nazi activity in his name; or that he poses a threat to fragile diplomatic alliances (see Russia, Taiwan). If it hadnât been for Obamaâs stepping in to temporarily halt the DAPL or the Arctic drilling, we the people would feel utterly adrift. Do the Democrats exist other than as flaccid interview subjects? A party who declares âWe donât know yet what Trump will do…so weâll wait and see…â This makes no sense unless you are, in fact, indebted to the same forces that have allowed Trump to have the power he suddenly has.
Unless you speak up unequivocally and ardently for the people in general, you have no right to use the term âprogressiveâ or claim to be making âprogress.â Moreover, articles IV, V, VI, VII, IX, X, XII, XIII, of your platform statement are empty. Fear that you may ârock the boatâ of potential funders, corporate leaders, and your peers, and consequently lose your position, must end. You wonât be remembered for being a coward. We the people are ready for radical action and will support you in real numbers if you actually act judiciously and decisively.
Start right now. Donât be on the defense, start an offense. Take Trump to task. Give interviews and raise direct questions pointing the media to where they should cast their eye. Comment critically on the consistency of Trumpâs inconsistencies. Question his cabinet choices and their role in his campaign financing openly. Demand to see Trumpâs and his familyâs tax returns. Demand he lives in the White House or that he pay for it personally â why should the taxpayer finance this when children in the US go without food, education or healthcare? Be like Joseph Welchâthe lawyer who memorably asked McCarthy during a televised hearing–whether he had âno sense of decency. â Win (back) the support of the American people by your actions and your words. Platitudes and empty promises are evident even to young children, and it is this flaccidity that attracted many people to Trump in the first place. And itâs this inability to be courageous in the face of real opposition that is fueling my own disenchantment with the Democrats. We the people are terrified of the day that Obama leaves office and takes any integrity and intelligence modern politics may have with him. Most of we Democrats suspect there will be a power vacuum that, at best, will lead to complete kleptocracy and authoritarianism. In the worse scenario, to global destabilization and war – neither is good.
Get off the fence now.
Sincerely,